Below is the catalog, composed
with a view to quickly obtain data for basic website quality rating.
1.
Evaluate Standards
The
webpage which fails to comply with the standards could have different errors,
which are very difficult to predict. Starting from the problems in different
browsers, to poor Google indexing. With the help comes the W3C, which sets
standards and provides ready to use tools:
* HTML,
XHTML – http://validator.w3.org/
* CSS – http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
* FEED (RSS or ATOM) – http://validator.w3.org/feed/
* CSS – http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
* FEED (RSS or ATOM) – http://validator.w3.org/feed/
2.
Evaluate Design
The
design has many meanings, here it comes mainly about how the site will be
looked in different environments. Is not too wide, too high and looks the same
in Firefox or Opera.
* Plenty
of browsers, systems, etc – http://browsershots.org/
* Look at webpage in different resolution – http://www.markhorrell.com/tools/browser.html
* Look at webpage in different resolution – http://www.markhorrell.com/tools/browser.html
3.
Evaluate Performance
Underestimated
but very important issue: the speed of page loading. We can have beautiful
graphics, animations and great scripts but the user may not wait for full page
load. Remember that we need to count the full load, not just the size of the
HTML source, but also images, flash, ads, scripts and dynamic content via AJAX.
*
Popular, cute tool – http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/
* Overall page performance – http://site-perf.com/
* Overall page performance – http://site-perf.com/
4.
Evaluate SEO Quality
Search
engine optimization is a difficult and lengthy process but most mistakes are
the same, easy and crucial errors that substantially reduce the Google ranking.
The following tools, which very quickly learn us problems at the site in terms
of SEO:
*
Complete SEO Analyzer – http://www.seoworkers.com/tools/analyzer.html
* Google Webmaster Guidelines – http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
* Google Webmaster Guidelines – http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
5.
Evaluate Linking
Dead
links are strictly connected with bad SEO score. Good to have many inner and
outer links, but not too many and all must live Google Webmaster Tools are
very useful particularly for the analysis of the number of links from other
sites.
* W3C
Tool – http://validator.w3.org/checklink
* DeadLinks – http://www.dead-links.com/
* Google Webmaster Tools – https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/
* DeadLinks – http://www.dead-links.com/
* Google Webmaster Tools – https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/
6.
Evaluate Accessibility
Accessibility
lies close to the Usability which is hard to check by machine. We have
standards for websites accessibility and tools to rate it.
* Great,
visual tool – http://wave.webaim.org/
* Compliance with standards – http://www.contentquality.com/
* Standard – http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
* Standard – http://www.access-board.gov/508.htm
* Compliance with standards – http://www.contentquality.com/
* Standard – http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
* Standard – http://www.access-board.gov/508.htm
Conclusion
The above
list is not comprehensive and thorough but gives a elevated prospective to
rapidly confirm whether provided website has the basic and crucial defects and
the website quality is improved noticeably
No comments:
Post a Comment